#VU94490 Input validation error in Linux kernel - CVE-2022-48798

Vulnerability identifier: #VU94490

Vulnerability risk: Low

CVSSv4.0: 4.3 [CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/U:Clear]

CVE-ID: CVE-2022-48798

CWE-ID: CWE-20

Exploitation vector: Local

Exploit availability: No

Vulnerable software:
Linux kernel
Operating systems & Components / Operating system

Vendor: Linux Foundation

Description

The vulnerability allows a local user to perform a denial of service (DoS) attack.

The vulnerability exists due to improper input validation within the io_subchannel_chp_event() function in drivers/s390/cio/device.c. A local user can perform a denial of service (DoS) attack.

Mitigation
Install update from vendor's website.

Vulnerable software versions

Linux kernel: 5.15, 5.15 rc1, 5.15 rc2, 5.15 rc3, 5.15 rc4, 5.15 rc5, 5.15 rc6, 5.15 rc7, 5.15.0, 5.15.1, 5.15.2, 5.15.3, 5.15.4, 5.15.5, 5.15.6, 5.15.7, 5.15.8, 5.15.9, 5.15.10, 5.15.11, 5.15.12, 5.15.13, 5.15.14, 5.15.15, 5.15.16, 5.15.17, 5.15.18, 5.15.19, 5.15.20, 5.15.21, 5.15.22, 5.15.23, 5.16, 5.16 rc1, 5.16 rc2, 5.16 rc3, 5.16 rc4, 5.16 rc5, 5.16 rc6, 5.16 rc8, 5.16.0, 5.16.1, 5.16.2, 5.16.3, 5.16.4, 5.16.5, 5.16.6, 5.16.7, 5.16.8, 5.16.9, 5.17 rc1, 5.17 rc2, 5.17 rc3, 5.17 rc4, 5.17 rc5, 5.17 rc6, 5.17 rc7, 5.17 rc8, 5.17 rc9, 5.17 rc12

---

External links
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe990b7bf6ac93f1d850d076b8f0e758268aa4ab
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0619027f11590b2070624297530c34dc7f91bcd
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd9cb842fa9d90653a9b48aba52f89c069f3bc50
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.15.24
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.16.10
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.17

---

Q & A

Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely?

No. This vulnerability can be exploited locally. The attacker should have authentication credentials and successfully authenticate on the system.

Is there known malware, which exploits this vulnerability?

No. We are not aware of malware exploiting this vulnerability.